April 17, 2007
Are they just pointing the finger at the wrong people...for the wrong reasons...and the wrong type of cover -up? Now I understand….Now I realize….there possibly really is a VAST left wing conspiracy….not only is it possible that the Clintons knew about the Al Qaeda plot for 9/11 before President Bush was elected/inaugurated…but it is also possible that they were (via sandyberger) complicit in a post 9/11 cover up of who knew what…and when… did the Clinton Whitehouse/CIA know…and if they did…is it possible they did NOT tell the Bush Whitehouse? Why did sandyberger steal documents…and shred them…later gladly falling on his sword for his boss? All of this begs to wonder…is this why the “truther” crowd emerged? Were they fed BS info by the leftists who should have sounded the alarm…in order to redirect the public eye from a blatant gross negligence?
From Atlas Shrugs:
France’s Le Monde newspaper said it had obtained 328 pages of classified documents on Osama bin Laden’s terror network that were drawn up by the French foreign intelligence service, the DGSE, between July 2000 and October 2001… Le Monde reported that the documents included a note dated Jan. 5, 2001, which said al-Qaida had been working on a hijacking plot for months. The intelligence note reported that bin Laden had attended a meeting in
The newspaper said the DGSE report was passed on to the CIA chief in
Now by coincidence this is the time frame the infamous Richard Clark document was being passed around the NSC for comment - the same document which Sandy Bergler stole from the National Archives and shredded in his office. It would make sense that whatever the French detected not only did they pass it on to
35 queries taking 0.049 seconds, 98 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.